- Conference Overview
- IEEE Formatting Instructions
- Conference Venue
- Program Committee
- Accepted Papers
- Call for Industry Papers
- RE’17 Photos
Conference Overview
RE’17 offered a comprehensive program of interest to academia, government agencies, and industry. It included several outstanding keynote speakers and three days of conference sessions packed with talks, panel discussions, posters, and demonstrations. A series of engaging workshops aimed at developing skills and raising awareness of requirements engineering methods is of particular interest to industry. Two days of seminars, as well as a symposium for doctoral students, will provide participants with the opportunity to present leading-edge methods and approaches in specific areas.
IEEE Formatting Instructions
Conference-Specific Requirements
The format of your paper must strictly adhere to the IEEEtran Proceedings Format. There are several versions of the IEEE style. Please make sure you use exactly the versions that are linked below.
LaTeX users: please use the LaTeX class file IEEEtran v1.8 (CTAN archive) and the following configuration (without option ‘compsoc’ or ‘compsocconf’):
\documentclass[conference]{IEEEtran}
Word users: please use this Word template (see also the corresponding PDF file for comparison).
General Formatting
Make sure your paper:
- does not exceed the page limit specified,
- is in PDF format,
- is in letter page size,
- does not have page numbers,
- has all fonts embedded in the PDF file,
- uses only scalable font types (like Type 1, TrueType) — bit-mapped font types (like Type 3) are not acceptable,
- has all figures embedded in vector graphics (if not possible, use a high-resolution bitmap format of at least 300 dpi; do not use JPG, but a lossless format like PNG or GIF),
- has all text in figures and tables large enough and readable when printed,
- has a caption for every figure or table,
- has the title and all headings properly capitalized (cf. Section Help),
- has no orphans and widows (cf. Section Help), and
- does not use footnote references in the abstract.
The use of color in regular body text (e.g., in order to emphasize words, URLs, or citations) is discouraged due to reduced readability and greyscale printing. The use of color is allowed in figures, tables, listings, and in non-body text, such as source code, XML snippets, etc.
Publishing
Accepted papers will be published as IEEE Xplore Digital Library Proceedings. All authors of all accepted contributions will be asked to complete an electronic IEEE Copyright form and will receive further instructions for preparing their camera-ready versions from Conference Publishing Services (CPS).
Acceptance of a paper implies that one of the authors registers for the conference to present the submission; failure to do so by the early registration date will result in the paper being withdrawn from the conference proceedings.
Conference proceedings will be submitted for inclusion into the IEEE Xplore Digital Library. IEEE reserves the right to exclude a paper from distribution after the conference (e.g., by not placing it into the IEEE Xplore Digital Library) if the paper is not presented at the conference.
Conference Venue
The mythical city of Lisbon
The historical city of Lisbon, capital of Portugal, carries many colorful legends. With its fado music, its colors and accent, Lisbon is a friendly and tolerant city by tradition. An amalgam of 800 years of cultural influences mingle with modern trends and life style, creating intricate and spectacular contrasts. Spread across seven hills always opening a window towards the majestic Tagus River. With its heart and soul in the Mediterranean and a history linked to the Atlantic, Lisbon is one of Europe’s most intriguing cities. This is the city from where the great explorers set off to discover new continents in the 15th century, and continues as visionary and as cosmopolitan today; its monuments and stunning architecture is now the backdrop to vibrant creativity, culture and business. With so much to offer, Lisbon gives a warm welcome to all RE 2017 participants.
Program Committee
Research Track
Daniel Amyot
Muneera Bano
University of Technology Sydney, Australia
Daniel M. Berry
University of Waterloo, Canada
Sjaak Brinkkemper
Utrecht University, Netherlands
Ruzanna Chitchyan
Jane Cleland-Huang
University of Notre Dame, USA
Maya Daneva
University of Twente, Netherlands
Jörg Dörr
Samuel Fricker
Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz, Switzerland
Sepideh Ghanavati
Martin Glinz
University of Zurich, Switzerland
Irit Hadar
Patrick Heymans
Jennifer Horkoff
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Seok-Won Lee
Patrick Mäder
Technische Universität Ilmenau, Germany
Nash Mahmoud
Louisiana State University, USA
Aaron Massey
University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA
John Mylopoulos
Nan Niu
Anna Perini
Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Italy
Günther Ruhe
Tetsuo Tamai
Tingting Yu
Didar Zowghi
Auckland University of Technology, Australia
Lin Liu
Review Committee
Nelly Condori-Fernandez
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
Xavier Franch
Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Spain
Vincenzo Gervasi
Tony Gorschek
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
Olly Gotel
Miguel Goulão
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
Zhi Jin
Marjo Kauppinen
Helsinki Institute for Information Technology, Finnland
Maria Lencastre
Escola Politécnica de Pernambuco, Brazil
Walid Maalej
University of Hamburg, Germany
Daniel Mendez
Technical University of Munich, Germany
Motoshi Saeki
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
Camille Salinesi
Pantheon-Sorbonne University, France
Kurt Schneider
Leibniz University of Hanover, Germany
Inge van de Weerd
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
Krzysztof Wnuk
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Poland
Eric Yu
Industry Track
Program Committee
Markus Borg, RISE SICS AB, Sweden
Lionel C. Briand, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Carlos Henrique Duarte, Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES), Brazil
Christof Ebert, Vector, Germany
Smita S. Ghaisas, Tata Research Development and Design Center (TCS Research), India
Anne Hoffman, Siemens AG, Germany
Waqar Hussain, Software Engineering Research Lab (SERL), Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand
Lena Johansson, Tetra Pak Packaging Solutions, Sweden
Kim Lauenroth, Adesso AG, Germany
Daniel Lucas-Hirtz, Sonova SA, Switzerland
Alistair Mavin, Rolls-Royce, UK
Nancy Mead, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
Ian Oliver, Nokia Bell-Labs, Finland
Erik Simmons, nuCognitive LLC, USA
Anil Thurmiella, Audi, Germany
Eero Uusitalo, IntoWorks Oy, Finland
Tao Yue, Simula Research Laboratory and University of Oslo, Norway
Data Track
Program Committee
Daniela Damian, University of Victoria, Canada
Neil Ernst, Software Engineering Institute, USA
João M. Fernandes, Universidade do Minho, Portugal
Jin Guo, University of Notre Dame, USA
Jennifer Horkoff, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Patrick Mäder, Ilmenau Technical University, Germany
Thorsten Merten, University of Bonn, Germany
Pradeep Kumar Murukannaiah, Rochester Institute of Technology, USA
Nan Niu, University of Cincinnati, USA
Mona Rahimi, DePaul University, USA
Miroslaw Staron, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
RE@Next!
Program Committee
Dalal Alrajeh, Imperial College, UK
Nelly Bencomo, Aston University, UK
Amel Bennaceur, Open University, UK
Dan Berry, University of Waterloo, Canada
Eya Ben Charrada, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Fabiano Dalpiaz, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Sepideh Ghanavati, Texas Tech University, USA
Aditya Ghose, University of Wollongong, Australia
Orlena Gotel, Independent Researcher, USA
Anne Koziolek, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Eric Knauss, Chalmers UNiversity, Swededn
Kim Lauenroth, Fachhoschule Dortmund, Germany
James Lockerbie, City University, UK
Julio Cesar Leite, PUC-Rio, Brazil
Haris Mouratidis, University of Brighton, UK
Aaron Massey, University of Maryland, USA
Elda Paja, University of Trento, Italy
Oscar Pastor, Universitat Politécnica de Valencia, Spain
Klaus Pohl, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Nauman A. Qureshi, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia
Nicholas Sannier, University or Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Norbert Seyff, University of Applied Sciences, NW Switzerland, Switzerland
Paola Spoletini, Kennesaw State University, USA
Alistair Sutcliffe, University of Manchester, UK
Roel Wieringa, University of Twente, The Netherlands
RE Silver Jubilee
Program Committee
Annie I. Antón, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
Daniel M. Berry, University of Waterloo, Canada
Karin Breitman, Dell EMC, Brazil
Jaelson Castro, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
Betty H.C. Cheng, Michigan State University, USA
Luiz Marcio Cysneiros, York University, Canada
Fabiano Dalpiaz, Utrecht University, Netherlands
Paolo Giorgini, Università di Trento, Italy
Martin Glinz, Universität Zürich, Switzerland
Tony Gorschek, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Sweden
Sarah C. Gregory, Intel Corporation, USA
Mats Heimdahl, University of Minnesota, USA
Patrick Heymans, Université de Namur, Belgium
Jeff Kramer, Imperial College, UK
Axel van Lamsweerde, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Pericles Loucopoulos, University of Manchester, UK
Robyn R. Lutz, Iowa State University, USA
Alistair Mavin, Rolls-Royce, UK
John Mylopoulos, University of Ottawa, Canada
Bashar Nuseibeh, The Open University, UK
Klaus Pohl, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Gustavo Rossi, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina
Alistair Sutcliffe, University of Manchester, UK
Eric Yu, University of Toronto, Canada
Accepted Papers
27 papers in the research track, 11 papers in the industry track, 7 papers in the data track, 10 posters/tool demos and 11 papers in RE@Next! are accepted this year! We also have 5 presentations accepted for the Special RE Silver Jubilee!
Select RE papers will be invited to a special issue of the Springer Requirements Engineering Journal (REJ)
More information about the accepted papers:
| ID | Paper | Track |
|---|---|---|
| R01 | Mining Associations between Quality Concerns and Functional Requirements Xiaoli Lian, Jane Cleland-Huang and Li Zhang | Research |
| R02 | Requirements Engineering Challenges in Large-Scale Agile System Development Rashidah Kasauli, Grischa Liebel, Eric Knauss, Swathi Gopakumar and Benjamin Kanagwa | Research |
| R03 | What do support analysts know about their customers? On the study and prediction of support ticket escalations in large software organizations Lloyd Montgomery and Daniela Damian | Research |
| R04 | Shorter Reasoning About Larger Requirements Models George Mathew, Tim Menzies, Neil Ernst and John Klein | Research |
| R05 | Modeling and Reasoning with Changing Intentions: An Experiment Alicia M. Grubb and Marsha Chechik | Research |
| R06 | Improving the Identification of Hedonic Quality in User Requirements – A Controlled Experiment Andreas Maier and Daniel Berry | Research |
| R07 | Canary: Extracting Requirements-Related Information from Online Discussions Georgi Kanchev, Pradeep Murukannaiah, Amit Chopra and Pete Sawyer | Research |
| R08 | Gamifying Collaborative Prioritization: Does Pointsification Work? Fitsum Meshesha Kifetew, Denisse Munante, Anna Perini, Angelo Susi, Alberto Siena, Paolo Busetta and Danilo Valerio | Research |
| R09 | What Requirements Knowledge do Developers Need to Manage Change in Safety-Critical Systems? Micayla Goodrum, Jinghui Cheng, Ronald Metoyer, Jane Cleland-Huang and Robyn Lutz | Research |
| R10 | Mining Twitter Feeds for Software User Requirements Grant Williams and Anas Mahmoud | Research |
| R11 | A Little Bird Told Me: Mining Tweets for Requirements and Software Evolution Emitza Guzman, Mohamed Ibrahim and Martin Glinz | Research |
| R12 | What Questions do Requirements Engineers Ask? Sugandha Malviya, Michael Vierhauser, Jane Cleland-Huang and Smita Ghaisas | Research |
| R13 | Mining User Rationale from Software Reviews Zijad Kurtanović and Walid Maalej | Research |
| R14 | Behind Points and Levels – The Influence of Gamification Algorithms on Requirements Prioritization Martina Kolpondinos-Huber and Martin Glinz | Research |
| R15 | Do words make a difference? An Empirical Study on the Impact of Taxonomies on the Identification of Requirements Kim Lauenroth, Erik Kamsties and Oliver Hehlert | Research |
| R16 | Evaluating the Relevance of Some Rules for Writing Requirements through an Online Survey Maxime Warnier and Anne Condamines | Research |
| R17 | Usability Insights for Requirements Engineering Tools: A User Study with Practitioners in Aeronautics Hélène Gaspard-Boulinc and Stéphane Conversy | Research |
| R18 | A framework for improving the verifiability of visual notation design grounded in the Physics of Notations Dirk van der Linden, Anna Zamansky and Irit Hadar | Research |
| R19 | Task Interruptions in Requirements Engineering: Reality versus Perceptions! Zahra Shakeri, Guenther Ruhe and Mike Bauer | Research |
| R20 | SAFE: A Simple Approach for Feature Extraction from App Descriptions and App Reviews Timo Johann, Christoph Stanik, Alireza M.Alizadeh B. and Walid Maalej | Research |
| R21 | Using Argumentation to Explain Ambiguity in Requirements Elicitation Interviews Yehia Elrakaiby, Alessio Ferrari, Paola Spoletini, Stefania Gnesi and Bashar Nuseibeh | Research |
| R22 | The Trouble With Security Requirements Sven Türpe | Research |
| R23 | Reinforcing Security Requirements with Multifactor Quality Measurement Hanan Hibshi and Travis D. Breaux | Research |
| R24 | New Horizons for Requirements Engineering David Callele, Krzysztof Wnuk and Birgit Penzenstadler | Research |
| R25 | Users – The Hidden Software Product Quality Experts? A Study on How Software Users Report Non-Functional Aspects in Online Reviews Eduard C. Groen, Sylwia Kopczyńska, Marc Hauer, Tobias Krafft and Jörg Dörr | Research |
| R26 | Datasets from Fifteen Years of Automated Software Traceability Research (Current State, Characteristics and Quality) Waleed Zogaan, Palak Sharma, Mehdi Mirakhorli and Venera Arnaoudova | Research |
| R27 | An Evaluation of Constituency-based Hypernymy Extraction from Privacy Policies Morgan C. Evans, Jaspreet Bhatia, Sudarshan Wadkar and Travis D. Breaux | Research |
| I01 | Legal Markup Generation in the Large: An Experience Report Nicolas Sannier, Morayo Adedjouma, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Lionel Briand, John Dann, Marc Hisette and Pascal Thill | Industry |
| I02 | Detecting Vague Words & Phrases in Requirements Documents in a Multilingual Environment Breno Cruz, Bargav Jayaraman, Anurag Dwarakanath and Collin McMillan | Industry |
| I03 | Piggybacking on an Autonomous Hauler: Business Models Enabling a System-of-Systems Approach to Mapping an Underground Mine Markus Borg, Thomas Olsson and John Svensson | Industry |
| I04 | Feedback Gathering from an Industrial Point of View Melanie Stade, Farnaz Fotrousi, Norbert Seyff and Oliver Albrecht | Industry |
| I05 | Requirements Capture and Analysis in ASSERT™ Andrew Crapo, Abha Moitra, Craig McMillan and Dan Russell | Industry |
| I06 | Does Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering Achieve its Goal? Alistair Mavin, Philip Wilkinson, Sabine Teufl, Henning Femmer, Jonas Eckhardt and Jakob Mund | Industry |
| I07 | Safety-Focused Security Requirements Elicitation for Medical Device Software Mikael Lindvall, Madeline Diep, Michele Klein, Paul Jones, Yi Zhang and Eugene Vasserman | Industry |
| I08 | A Case Study on a Specification Approach using Activity Diagrams in Requirements Documents Martin Beckmann, Andreas Vogelsang and Christian Reuter | Industry |
| I09 | How Much Undocumented Knowledge is there in Agile Software Development? Shinobu Saito, Yukako Iimura, Aaron Massey and Annie Antón | Industry |
| I10 | A Formalization Method to Process Structured Natural Language to Logic Expressions to Detect Redundant Specification and Test Statements Benedikt Walter, Jakob Hammes, Marco Piechotta and Stephan Rudolph | Industry |
| I11 | Software Requirements Analyst Profile: a descriptive study of Brazil and Mexico Angelica Toffano Seidel Calazans, Roberto Avila Paldês, Kiane Mabel Rezende, Emeli Braosi, Nathácia Indayara Pereira, Isabel Sofia Sousa Brito and Eloisa Toffano Seidel Masson | Industry |
| D01 | RE Data Challenge: Requirements Identification with Word2Vec and TensorFlow Alex Dekhtyar and Vivian Fong | Data |
| D02 | Automatically Classifying Functional and Non-Functional Requirements Using Supervised Machine Learning Zijad Kurtanović and Walid Maalej | Data |
| D03 | PURE: a Dataset of Public Requirements Documents Alessio Ferrari, Giorgio Oronzo Spagnolo and Stefania Gnesi | Data |
| D04 | Toward Automating Crowd RE Pradeep Kumar Murukannaiah, Nirav Ajmeri and Munindar Singh | Data |
| D05 | A Domain-independent Model for Identifying Security Requirements Nuthan Munaiah, Andrew Meneely and Pradeep K. Murukannaiah | Data |
| D06 | The IlmSeven Dataset Michael Rath and Patrick Maeder | Data |
| D07 | What Works Better? A Study of Classifying Requirements Zahra Shakeri, Oliver Karras, Parisa Ghazi, Martin Glinz, Guenther Ruhe and Kurt Schneider | Data |
| PD01 | UCAnalyzer: A Tool to Analyze Use Case Textual Descriptions Saurabh Tiwari and Mayank Laddha | Posters and Demos |
| PD02 | Let’s Hear it From RETTA: A Requirements Elicitation Tool For Traffic Management Systems Mohammad Noaeen and Behrouz Homayoun Far | Posters and Demos |
| PD03 | ÉCrits – Visualizing Support Ticket Escalation Risk Lloyd Montgomery, Emma Reading and Daniela Damian | Posters and Demos |
| PD04 | Deploying a Template and Pattern Library for Improved Reuse of Requirements across Projects Robert Darimont, Wei Zhao, Christophe Ponsard and Arnaud Michot | Posters and Demos |
| PD05 | Tool support for Automatic Runtime Reappraisal of Weights Luis Garcia Paucar and Nelly Bencomo | Posters and Demos |
| PD06 | Choosing Requirements for Experimentation with User Interfaces of Requirements Modeling Tools Parisa Ghazi, Zahra Shakeri Hossein Abad and Martin Glinz | Posters and Demos |
| PD07 | CoSTest: A tool for Validation of Requirements at Model Level Maria Fernanda Granda, Nelly Condori-Fernández, Tanja Vos and Oscar Pastor | Posters and Demos |
| PD08 | DMGame: A Gamified Collaborative Requirements Prioritisation Tool Fitsum Kifetew, Denisse Munante, Anna Perini, Angelo Susi, Alberto Siena and Paolo Busetta | Posters and Demos |
| PD09 | Canary: An Interactive and Query-Based Approach to Extract Requirements from Online Forums Georgi Kanchev, Pradeep Murukannaiah, Amit Chopra and Pete Sawyer | Posters and Demos |
| PD10 | A demonstration of Respecify: a requirements authoring tool harnessing CNL Michael Ledger | Posters and Demos |
| N01 | Pushing Boundaries of RE: Requirement Elicitation for Non-Human Users Anna Zamansky, Dirk van der Linden and Sofya Baskin | RE@Next! |
| N02 | Interview Review: Detecting Latent Ambiguities to Improve the Requirements Elicitation Process Alessio Ferrari, Paola Spoletini, Beatrice Donati, Didar Zowghi and Stefania Gnesi | RE@Next! |
| N03 | Search for Super App Functionality Maleknaz Nayebi and Guenther Ruhe | RE@Next! |
| N04 | Crowd Sourcing the Creation of Personae Non Gratae for Requirements-Phase Threat Modeling Nancy Mead, Forrest Shull, Janine Spears, Stefan Hiebl, Sam Weber and Jane Cleland-Huang | RE@Next! |
| N05 | Juggling Preferences in a World of Uncertainty Luis Garcia Paucar, Nelly Bencomo and Kevin Kam Fung Yue | RE@Next! |
| N06 | A Data Purpose Case Study of Privacy Policies Jaspreet Bhatia and Travis D. Breaux | RE@Next! |
| N07 | Exploiting User Feedback in Tool-supported Multi-criteria Requirements Prioritization Itzel Morales-Ramirez, Denisse Muñante, Fitsum Meshesha Kifetew, Anna Perini, Angelo Susi and Alberto Siena | RE@Next! |
| N08 | How do Practitioners Perceive the Relevance of Requirements Engineering Research? An Ongoing Study Xavier Franch, Daniel Méndez Fernández, Marc Oriol Hilari, Andreas Vogelsang, Rogardt Heldal, Eric Knauss, Guilherme Travassos, Jeffrey C. Carver, Oscar Dieste and Thomas Zimmermann | RE@Next! |
| N09 | A Gamified Tutorial for Learning about Security Requirements Engineering Daniel Alami Cabezas and Fabiano Dalpiaz | RE@Next! |
| N10 | A Visual Narrative Path From Switching to Resuming an RE Task Zahra Shakeri, Alex Shymka, Jenny Le, Noor Hammad and Guenther Ruhe | RE@Next! |
| N11 | Identifying Conflicting Requirements in Systems of Systems Thiago Viana, Andrea Zisman and Arosha K. Bandara | RE@Next! |
| SJ01 | The Right-Hand Side Problem: Research Topics in RE Michael Jackson | Silver Jubilee |
| SJ02 | Requirements Elicitation: A Look at the Future through the Lenses of the Past Paola Spoletini and Alessio Ferrari | Silver Jubilee |
| SJ03 | The Vision: Requirements Engineering in Society Guenther Ruhe, Maleknaz Nayebi and Christof Ebert | Silver Jubilee |
| SJ04 | Requirements Engineering in the Year Thousand Roel Wieringa | Silver Jubilee |
| SJ05 | RE at 50, with a focus on the last 25 years Robyn Lutz | Silver Jubilee |
| DS01 | Towards a Bayesian Decision Model for Agile Release Planning Olawole Oni | Doctoral Symposium |
| DS02 | Improving the Elicitation of Delightful Context-Aware Features: a Data-Based Approach Rodrigo Falcão | Doctoral Symposium |
| DS03 | An Approach to Support the Specification of Agile Artifacts in the Development of Safety-Critical Systems Ana Isabella Muniz Leite | Doctoral Symposium |
| DS04 | Reusable Goal Models Mustafa Berk Duran | Doctoral Symposium |
| DS05 | Dealing with Conflicts between Non-Functional Requirements of Ubicomp and IoT Applications Rainara Carvalho, Rossana Andrade and Kathia Oliveira | Doctoral Symposium |
| DS06 | Verifying Cyber-Physical System Behavior in the Context of Cyber-Physical System-Networks Jennifer Brings | Doctoral Symposium |
| DS07 | Towards an adaptive framework for goal-oriented strategic decision-making Jacek Dąbrowski | Doctoral Symposium |
| DS08 | Awareness Driven Software Reengineering Ana M. M. Moura | Doctoral Symposium |
| PN01 | RE in the age of continuous deployment Nan Niu | Panel |
| PN02 | Context-Dependent Evaluation of Tools for NL RE Tasks: Recall vs. Precision, and Beyond Daniel Berry | Panel |
Call for Industry Papers
The 25th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE’17) is the premier international forum for industrial practitioners, researchers, educators and students to discuss the most recent innovations, experiences and concerns in the discipline of Requirements Engineering.
Categories for Industry Papers
- Problem statement papers present problems or challenges encountered in practice
- Experience report papers present successes or failures encountered in practice
- Vision papers describe the future evolution of the field as perceived by industry practitioners based on practical experience
Topics of Interest
As Requirements Engineering is a broad field, topics may include, but are not limited to, any of the following:
- Industry Experiences
- Deploying new or improved processes
- Learning from practice
- Training practitioners
- Transferring technology from academia to industry
- Identifying best practices
- Improving productivity
- Industry benchmarks
- Stakeholder Management
- Requirements elicitation and negotiation
- Innovation through creativity
- Crowdsourcing
- Pragmatic Requirements Engineering
- Good-enough Requirements Engineering
- Agile and lean approaches
- Large-scale Requirements Engineering
- Complex systems
- Product lines and Value chains
- Software Ecosystems, big data, and cloud technologies
- Global Requirements Engineering
- Geographically-dispersed teams
- Culturally-divergent requirements efforts
- Requirements Specification and Validation Techniques
- Natural language
- Model-driven
- Formal approaches
- Requirements management tools
- Traceability
- Domain-specific Requirements Engineering
- Embedded systems
- Open source software
- Privacy
- Security
- Mixed software/hardware systems
- Quality engineering
- User experience
- Quality factors
- Safety and security
- Test approaches
- Life cycle Product Management
- Value creation techniques
- Product evolution
- Requirements and marketing
RE’17 Photos: Let’s remember great moments!
It was wonderful having you in RE’17! Although it’s now over, the good news is that you can relive the amazing times we had in Lisbon! As we say in Portugal, “recordar é viver” (remembering is living). See you!
You can find the photos of RE’17 in the following links: